Genealogy of Jesus?

answers1: Matthew's Gospel has the genealogy of Joseph. Luke's Gospel
has that of Mary.
answers2: One is from Jesus' father's side. The other from his mother's side.
answers3: Both Mary and Joseph were descendents of David. <br>
<br>
Matthew 1 shows the geneaology of Joseph <br>
<br>
Beginning in Luke 3:23, you will find the geneaology of Mary. The
verse should have been translated Joseph the son-in-law of Heli. Both
geneaologies cannot be Joseph's because there are different ancestors
listed in each one. <br>
<br>
Now, why is Yashua considered the son of Joseph? Simple, rules of
adoption. Think of the movie Ben Hur when Charleton Heston is adopted
by the Roman General. He became fully Roman at that time and was fully
a member of that Roman family and the heir of all the General had.
<br>
<br>
So it was with Yashua as Joseph's first born son, by adoption. As
such, Yashua was entitled to all the rights and privlidge of the
firstborn son.
answers4: See <a href="http://www.bcbsr.com/survey/sgosp1.html"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.bcbsr.com/survey/sgosp1.html</a>
answers5: The difference in nearly all the names in Luke's genealogy
of Jesus as compared with Matthew's is quickly resolved in the fact
that Luke traced the line through David's son Nathan, instead of
Solomon as did Matthew. (Lu 3:31; Mt 1:6, 7) Luke evidently follows
the ancestry of Mary, thus showing Jesus' natural descent from David,
while Matthew shows Jesus' legal right to the throne of David by
descent from Solomon through Joseph, who was legally Jesus' father.
Both Matthew and Luke signify that Joseph was not Jesus' actual father
but only his adoptive father, giving him legal right. Matthew departs
from the style used throughout his genealogy when he comes to Jesus,
saying: "Jacob became father to Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom
Jesus was born, who is called Christ." (Mt 1:16) Notice that he does
not say 'Joseph became father to Jesus' but that he was "the husband
of Mary, of whom Jesus was born." Luke is even more pointed when,
after showing earlier that Jesus was actually the Son of God by Mary
(Lu 1:32-35), he says: "Jesus . . . being the son, as the opinion was,
of Joseph, son of Heli."—Lu 3:23. <br>
<br>
Since Jesus was not the natural son of Joseph but was the Son of God,
Luke's genealogy of Jesus would prove that he was, by human birth, a
son of David through his natural mother Mary. Regarding the
genealogies of Jesus given by Matthew and by Luke, Frederic Louis
Godet wrote: "This study of the text in detail leads us in this way to
admit—1. That the genealogical register of Luke is that of Heli, the
grandfather of Jesus; 2. That, this affiliation of Jesus by Heli being
expressly opposed to His affiliation by Joseph, the document which he
has preserved for us can be nothing else in his view than the
genealogy of Jesus through Mary. But why does not Luke name Mary, and
why pass immediately from Jesus to His grandfather? Ancient sentiment
did not comport with the mention of the mother as the genealogical
link. Among the Greeks a man was the son of his father, not of his
mother; and among the Jews the adage was: 'Genus matris non vocatur
genus ["The descendant of the mother is not called (her) descendant"]'
('Baba bathra,' 110, a)."—Commentary on Luke, 1981, p. 129. <br>
<br>
Actually each genealogy (Matthew's table and Luke's) shows descent
from David, through Solomon and through Nathan. (Mt 1:6; Lu 3:31) In
examining the lists of Matthew and Luke, we find that after diverging
at Solomon and Nathan, they come together again in two persons,
Shealtiel and Zerubbabel. This can be explained in the following way:
Shealtiel was the son of Jeconiah; perhaps by marriage to the daughter
of Neri he became Neri's son-in-law, thus being called the "son of
Neri." It is possible as well that Neri had no sons, so that Shealtiel
was counted as his "son" for that reason also. Zerubbabel, who was
likely the actual son of Pedaiah, was legally reckoned as the son of
Shealtiel, as stated earlier.—Compare Mt 1:12; Lu 3:27; 1Ch 3:17-19.
<br>
<br>
Then the accounts indicate that Zerubbabel had two sons, Rhesa and
Abiud, the lines diverging again at this point. (These could have
been, not actual sons, but descendants, or one, at least, could have
been a son-in-law. Compare 1Ch 3:19.) (Lu 3:27; Mt 1:13) Both
Matthew's and Luke's genealogies of Jesus vary here from that found in
1 Chronicles chapter 3. This may be because a number of names were
purposely left out by Matthew and possibly also by Luke. But the fact
should be kept in mind that such differences in the genealogical lists
of Matthew and Luke are very likely those already present in the
genealogical registers then in use and fully accepted by the Jews and
were not changes made by Matthew and Luke. <br>
<br>
We may conclude, therefore, that the two lists of Matthew and Luke
fuse together the two truths, namely, (1) that Jesus was actually the
Son of God and the natural heir to the Kingdom by miraculous birth
through the virgin girl Mary, of David's line, and (2) that Jesus was
also the legal heir in the male line of descent from David and Solomon
through his adoptive father Joseph. (Lu 1:32, 35; Ro 1:1-4) If there
was any accusation made by hostile Jews that Jesus' birth was
illegitimate, the fact that Joseph, aware of the circumstances,
married Mary and gave her the protection of his good name and royal
lineage refutes such slander.
answers6: I understand the place you're coming from whether, you're
employing mortal genealogical situations to a Supernatural Being, and
the residences of the supernatural. organic Holy Spirit does not own a
corporal physique, this is omniscient, all-powerful and omnipresent.
in this context Jesus descended from the Holy Spirit or quite God the
father; (God the father (writer) God the Son (Savior) God the Holy
Spirit) this is a controversy of and reliant on, the Holy Trinity a
secret the human ideas has no longer the skill to understand. Mary
bore the toddler Jesus by using the skill of what's called the
stainless concept, returned a supernatural secret no longer sure by
using genealogical or mortal territories. Joseph replaced into no
longer Jesus's organic and organic father; Joseph replaced into the
husband of the Blessed Virgin Mary. i do no longer locate your
question a waste of time, the hunt for theTruth, nor the solutions. in
my opinion this is time properly spent, and maximum truthfully a
fashion of acquiring information and/or expending information. God
bless.